Title

GriffonNest · Post by **GriffonNest** » 4. October 2005, 17:15

I just though that Broken Sword 2.5: The Return of the Templers looks rather stupid (I'm talking about that 2.5)
Heh, it reminds me of Lion King 1/2 :)

You guys should just call it Broken Sword: The Return of the Templers :D

Just my opinion :D
Anyone agree/disagree ? :)

Post by **Tooms** » 4. October 2005, 19:40

I don't see your connection between Broken Sword 2.5 to Lion King 1/2. Why are you confused about it?

I think the title is okay, because 2.5 represents the time in which our game is placed in the Broken Sword saga.

GriffonNest · Post by **GriffonNest** » 6. October 2005, 19:52

Tooms wrote:I don't see your connection between Broken Sword 2.5 to Lion King 1/2. Why are you confused about it?

I think the title is okay, because 2.5 represents the time in which our game is placed in the Broken Sword saga.

Haha I never said there is a connection, I said it REMINDS me the title of Lion King 1/2 as in 1.5 :)

If all games would put the timelines in their titles we would have Call Of Duties 1.33, King Quests 2.79 etc.. :D

But heh, just my opinion :D

SleepingDragon · Post by **SleepingDragon** » 6. October 2005, 20:34

Yup i know what you mean , but i think for an unofficial follower game it is better to call it like Broken Sword 2.5 .
You can immediatly recognize it as an unofficial fan project-game , i think BrokenSword: The Return of the Templars would sound more like an official continuation of the serie. And maybe Revolution dont want that a fan project is called like that cause it sounds like an official follower. (sorry for my english lol im a bit sleepy^)

Habs auch erst so wie du verstanden Toom aber er meinte , dass es sich seltsam anhört es baphomets Fluch 2.5 zu nennen anstatt nur Broken Sword: The Return of the templars . Weil man dann Call of Duty 2 auch Call of Duty 1.5 nennen könnte. Wobei ich finde , dass man dann besser erkennt , dass es keine offizielle fortsetzung ist.

Post by **Tooms** » 6. October 2005, 21:34

GriffonNest wrote:
Tooms wrote:If all games would put the timelines in their titles we would have Call Of Duties 1.33, King Quests 2.79 etc.. :D

But heh, just my opinion :D

Ah, okay... I see. Indeed, we could call it just Broken Sword without any number. The number is just a help for you to have an idea in which time our game plays. Of course, you can ignore it.